Today, war is no longer waged only on the front lines; it is waged in server rooms, data centers, and artificial intelligence laboratories. An intellectual stands at that threshold where it is decided whether knowledge will be an instrument of liberation or a weapon of mass destruction. As the military pact set to convene in Ankara prepares to turn technology—the common heritage of humanity—into fuel for its own appetite for destruction, to remain silent is to become complicit in this cyber-colonialism. Justice is the cause not only of the courts, but also of those who care about in whose hands technology and power lie.

THE 2026 ANKARA SUMMIT: DATE AND AGENDA

NATO's 36th Summit of Heads of State and Government will be held on July 7-8, 2026, in Ankara, at the Presidential Complex.

The Summit's Core Agenda Items:

• The Eastern Flank and Enlargement: New phases of the strategy of encircling Russia via Ukraine and the Caucasus.
• The Middle East and the Mediterranean: Making the military presence in the region permanent under the name of securing energy routes.
• Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Warfare: The digitalization of war and the integration of autonomous weapons systems—matters that closely concern IT workers.
• Turkey's Role: Consolidating Turkey's position as a "loyal ally" following the accession of Sweden and Finland.

THE NATO-TURKEY RELATIONSHIP: A STORY OF DEPENDENCY

Turkey's NATO membership—"paid for in blood" by sending soldiers to Korea on February 18, 1952—is not merely a defense alliance but a tutelary mechanism that has seeped into the country's domestic politics, army, and police.

Turkey's NATO adventure is, rather than a need for defense, a process of "redesign" in which the country's genetic code was tampered with. This process is the chronology not only of a military but of a political, economic, and bureaucratic surrender.

A. Collaborationist Governments and "The First Signatures of Surrender"

Dependency began as an economic "indebtment" operation with the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan in 1947.

• The Menderes Era (1950-1960): The soldiers sent to Korea for the sake of NATO membership marked the first great rupture in which a country's sovereignty was made a subject of bargaining. By opening the army and intelligence to American doctrines, the Menderes government laid the foundations of the structure we now call the "state within the state."
• The Demirel and Özal Eras: With the dream of becoming "Little America," the country's strategic ports, bases, and intelligence networks were fully integrated into NATO standards (that is, into U.S. control). The IMF packages that came after each "economic crisis" were, in fact, invoices for NATO loyalty.

B. The Virus That Seeped into the State Apparatus: The Counter-Guerrilla and Special Warfare

With NATO membership, the Mobilization Inspection Board (later named the Special Warfare Department), established within the Turkish Armed Forces, was structured under direct CIA financing and training.

• The Turkish Branch of Gladio: This structure—the Turkish leg of the "Stay-behind" operations in Europe—stepped outside the state's official hierarchy and operated like a "parallel state."
• Its Mission Definition: Not resistance against a possible Soviet invasion, but the suppression of the rising left movement, the awakening of the working class, and anti-imperialist intellectuals. The May 1, 1977 Massacre and the events in Maraş and Çorum bear the bloody signature of this "NATO-patented" apparatus.

C. CIA Projects and Intelligence Dependency

The CIA never saw Turkey merely as an ally; this place was always an "operations theater" and a "listening station."

• "Our Boys Have Done It": This note, which CIA Ankara Station Chief Paul Henze passed to the White House after the September 12, 1980 coup, is a confession of who controlled the very top of the state apparatus. The 1980 coup was a "social engineering" project orchestrated by NATO to open Turkey to neoliberal exploitation.
• The Green Belt Project: The CIA's project of using Islamism as a "dam" against the rise of the left in the region infected Turkey's state apparatus with religious orders and congregations. The roots of the political crises we live through today lie in these laboratory experiments of the CIA.
• The Deception of Intelligence Sharing: Turkey's intelligence network (MİT) was for years forced into an asymmetric relationship with the CIA and Mossad under the name of "joint work." The data we produced flowed to them, but we were given only the "directive" information that passed through their filters.

DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY AND THE NEW THREAT OF 2026: AN ANATOMY OF TECHNOLOGICAL CAPTIVITY

As an IT worker and intellectual, we must decipher this digital shackle—marketed under the name of "security"—with the meticulousness of a system architect. We are in the year 2026, and occupation is no longer carried out with boots but with commands seeping in through fiber-optic cables and algorithms.

Turkey's NATO membership process is not merely an entry into a military alliance; it is the story of the country's entire nervous system (communication, energy, defense, and data infrastructure) being connected to Washington and Brussels via a "backdoor." This is a state of digital mandate in which sovereignty remains on paper, but "root" authority lies with foreign powers.

1. The Standardization Trap: The "STANAG" Shackle

The standards NATO imposes under the name of "Interoperability" (STANAG - Standardization Agreement) are in fact a tool for creating a technological monopoly.

• How Were We Made Captive? In order to conform its army and communication networks to NATO standards, Turkey abandoned its own national architectures. These standards determine everything from the radio frequency used to the data-packaging protocols. The result: when you try to develop a non-NATO technology, you get stamped "incompatible with the system" and are made dependent on the outside even within your own defense industry.
• The Form of Domination: The NATO Communications and Information Agency (NCIA) is the "architectural auditor" of Turkey's entire military communications network. That is, the lock of the door is in your hands, but the NCIA determines the key's code.

2. The Software Rootkit: "Black Box" Systems

Turkey has for years acquired defense systems through NATO via "allied aid" or purchases. But the software (Source Code) that is the heart of these systems has never been opened to us.

• Invisible Dominion: Inside the aircraft, radars, and cyber-defense shields we have purchased run closed-circuit software whose contents we do not know. This software contains mechanisms that can be remotely disabled when certain "geographic coordinates" or "enemy definitions" (Friend or Foe) come into play.
• The 2026 Threat: Today, the "kernel libraries" of many systems claimed to be made with national means are still dependent on NATO-origin commercial software. In the event of an embargo or political crisis, it is technically possible to paralyze Turkey's entire digital infrastructure with a "kill switch."

3. Cloud Colonialism and Data Espionage

In NATO's 2026 concept, the greatest threat is the centralization of "Big Data."

• Data Mining: Sensor data from Turkey's strategic regions, UAV/UCAV records, and even civilian communication traffic data flow in real time to data centers abroad (especially to the Maryland/U.S. - NSA centers) via NATO's "Joint Intelligence and Surveillance" networks.
• The Digital Invader: Radar stations such as Kürecik collect data not for Turkey's security, but for NATO's (and therefore Israel's) missile shield. How much of the data obtained from these stations is shared with Ankara, and how much is "filtered," is a complete black box.

4. The Horror of 2026: Cognitive Warfare

With the 2026 Ankara Summit, NATO is focusing on the "Human Mind," which it defines as the "Sixth Operational Domain."

• Algorithmic Dominion: Managing a people's psychology via social media algorithms is NATO's new doctrine of war. Turkey's electoral processes, social events (from Gezi to today), and justice struggles like that of Can Atalay are simulated in NATO's "information operations" (Information Ops) centers.
• The Threat Is This: A state apparatus that wages psychological warfare against its own people has in fact turned into NATO's social engineering laboratory. The captivity of the intellectual begins with the people's mind being subdued by this algorithmic siege.

HOW AND IN WHAT MANNER WERE THEY DOMINATED? (THE STATISTICAL REALITY)

1. The Communication Layer: The data links used by the Turkish Armed Forces, such as Link-16 and Link-22, are tied umbilically to satellites and crypto keys under NATO/U.S. control.
2. The Energy Layer: The SCADA systems of critical infrastructures (dams, power plants) have, under the name of "NATO protection" against cyberattacks, been entrusted to foreign security software. This means handing the control of your energy over to someone else.
3. The Intelligence Layer: Almost all of our SIGINT (Signals Intelligence) systems, under the name of a "common data pool," place every kind of information before the Pentagon without any filtering.

NATO'S HUMANITY RECORD: WHY MUST WE OPPOSE IT?

Since its founding in 1949, NATO has not made the world a safer place; on the contrary, it has institutionalized conflicts and cloaked colonialism in a "modern" military guise. Here is the humanity report card of this "crime syndicate":

A. The Lie of "Humanitarian Intervention" and the Dismemberment of Yugoslavia (1999)

NATO, completely bypassing the United Nations (UN), bombed a sovereign state without pause for 78 days.

• Civilian Targets: With the fairy tale of "precision strikes," trains, refugee convoys, state television stations, and the Chinese Embassy were targeted.
• Ecological Genocide: The depleted uranium used in the bombings condemned the region to a wave of cancer and genetic degeneration that will last for generations. This is the eternal poisoning of the soil and water.
• The Result: The Balkans were divided into ethnic micro-statelets and turned into a playground for imperialism.

B. Libya: The Liquidation of a State and Slave Markets (2011)

The operation launched on the pretext of "protecting the people" (Responsibility to Protect) reduced to ruins one of the countries with the highest human development index in Africa.

• Destruction: As Libya's entire infrastructure collapsed under NATO air strikes, the state apparatus was completely eliminated.
• The Result: Today Libya is an example of a "failed state"—where refugees drown in the Mediterranean, medieval-style slave markets are set up in its streets, and terrorist organizations run rampant. NATO seized Libya's gold reserves and oil and left a wreck behind.

C. Afghanistan: 20 Years of "Rowing in Vain" and Drone Savagery (2001-2021)

NATO's longest "operation" in its history became the laboratory of modern war crimes.

• Algorithmic Slaughter: This is the part that most wounds IT workers: armed UAVs that struck wedding convoys and farm workers, calling them "faulty data" or "suspicious behavior," turned Afghanistan into a video game arena.
• The Economy of Corruption: The billions of dollars sent from the West flowed into the pockets of NATO-collaborator warlords rather than reaching the people.
• The Result: People trying to escape by clinging to the wings of NATO planes at the end of twenty years are the most tragic photograph of this pact's promise of "freedom."

D. Gladio and Europe's "Internal Enemy" Strategy

NATO does not fight only abroad; within member countries, it also wages war against the people.

• Stay-Behind Operations: The secret structures established in Italy, France, and Turkey (via the Special Warfare Department) liquidated leftist politics and sabotaged democratic processes through assassinations, bombings, and disinformation. NATO created a "shadow constitution" above the constitutions of member countries.

E. The Threat of Nuclear Apocalypse and the Arms Race

Under the name of "nuclear deterrence," NATO holds the world on the brink of nuclear annihilation.

• The Cost of Peace: The total military spending of NATO member countries is dozens of times the amount that would be enough to solve all the hunger, thirst, and the climate crisis in the world.
• Economic Captivity: Capital invests not in peace but in war. Every new missile system is stolen from a child's milk, from a worker's social security.

WHY MUST WE OPPOSE IT?

1. Lawlessness: For NATO, international law is valid only as long as it serves its own interests. The local lawlessness that refuses to recognize Can Atalay's freedom is a branch of NATO's global lawlessness.
2. Ecological Destruction: One of the institutions with the largest carbon footprint in the world is NATO's vast military apparatus. The war machine is nature's greatest enemy.
3. Technological Fascism: With advanced surveillance systems and artificial intelligence weapons, NATO occupies not only physical borders but also digital borders and minds.
4. Exploitation of Labor: NATO is the "debt collector" of global capital. This structure, which exploits the resources of peoples through debt interest and arms purchases, is the working class's greatest adversary.

THE ANTI-NATO FRONT OF THE TURKISH LEFT: TİP AND EMEP

TİP (Workers' Party of Turkey): "NATO Is a Crime Syndicate, a Shackle on Sovereignty"

TİP's anti-NATO stance places the matter on a modern ground of "independence and democracy." For them, NATO is not merely a military pact but a "tutelary apparatus" that poisons Turkey's domestic law and social peace.

• Economic Burden and the People's Bread: TİP argues that "every kuruş spent on NATO is stolen from the people's pocket." It opposes the transfer of high military spending to arms monopolies by cutting it from the education and health budgets. The demand "Not a war budget, but a people's budget" is TİP's core slogan.
• The Constitution and the Can Atalay Connection: TİP sees NATO's existence as "the transfer of constitutional sovereignty." It exposes how a system that unlawfully keeps its own member of parliament (Can Atalay) imprisoned can become a mere extra in NATO's "security" fairy tales. For them, a true state of law is built not with militarily imposed doctrines from outside, but with the will of the people.
• A Rejection of the War Machine: TİP opposes Turkey being made NATO's "forward outpost" from Ukraine to the Middle East. They pursue the politics of "Neither NATO nor Russia; an independent Turkey and regional peace."

EMEP (Labour Party): "Imperialists Out, Bases Closed!"

EMEP reads the matter from a more classical and class-based line of anti-imperialism, through "the unity of the working class and the brotherhood of peoples."

https://www.emep.org/halklarin-dusmani-nato-dagitilmalidir

• Bases and Concrete Independence: For EMEP, anti-NATO struggle is a concrete struggle for "the closure of the bases." They defend the immediate closure of all foreign bases, primarily İncirlik and Kürecik, and the expulsion of U.S./NATO soldiers from the country.
• A Class-Based View: They say, "War is the need of capital; peace is the need of the worker." They emphasize that NATO's expansionist policies set the working class against one another and deepen exploitation. For them, NATO is the "debt collector and police" of international capital.
• Regional Peace: EMEP states that NATO's "enlargement" strategy drags the peoples of the region into catastrophe. They argue that every kind of regional problem, from the Kurdish question to the Aegean crisis, falls into deeper deadlock with NATO intervention, and that the solution lies in the common struggle of the region's peoples.

COMMON DISCOURSES AND THE PERSPECTIVE ON THE 2026 SUMMIT

These two parties (and the other leftist components) converge against the 2026 Ankara Summit on the following common ground:

1. "Out of NATO!" (This is, indisputably, the most fundamental and shared demand.)
2. "Killer NATO, Collaborationist Government!" (They characterize the current government's "loyalty" to NATO policies as collaborationism.)
3. "Budget Not for Weapons, but for Earthquakes and Education!" (They wage a powerful agitation that military spending is neither rational nor humane.)
4. "Not a Blue Homeland, but an Independent Homeland!" (They explain that NATO projects, hidden behind nationalist arguments, in fact make Turkey more dependent.)

https://www.notonato2026.org/?lang=tr

The notonato2026.org platform is a comprehensive information center that brings together critical analyses, reports, and civil society announcements concerning the NATO summit to be held in Ankara in 2026. The platform aims to offer a data-based perspective on the economic repercussions of military spending, the social effects of international security policies, and the historical process of the alliance. Providing access from a single point to expert opinions closely following the summit agenda, an up-to-date calendar of events, and academic articles on the subject, this medium is a fundamental reference source for researchers, members of the press, and conscientious citizens seeking a rational and alternative ground for debate on defense policies.

WHAT IS THE SITUATION ON THE IT FRONT?

As IT workers, we refuse to allow the code we write, the networks we build, and the artificial intelligences we develop to be used in NATO's "target acquisition" algorithms. Science and technology are not for striking a child with a drone, but for the elevation of humanity.

Comrade, as an intellectual and IT worker, we unite these two lines:

• The question of "Digital Sovereignty and Law" emphasized by TİP,
• We blend it with the question of "Class-Based Anti-Imperialism and Bases" emphasized by EMEP.

In short, we say this: We will not hand our code over to imperialism's war algorithms, our homeland over to NATO's bases, nor our future over to the Pentagon's strategic plans!

"Those who come to Ankara on July 7 are the representatives not of humanity but of arms dealers. While the people's justice (Can Atalay) is behind bars, NATO's 'security' is a false show on the outside."

A CALL TO ACTION: "THEY WILL LEAVE AS THEY CAME!"

Exactly 108 years ago, that anti-imperialist will that looked at the occupation fleet anchored in the Bosphorus and said "They will leave as they came!" must come alive once again, today in July 2026, in the streets of Ankara. The place of that day's battleships may today be taken by NATO's cyber shields, nuclear threats, and digital shackles; but our love of independence and our determination to defend our labor have not changed.

This is not merely a call to protest; it is a manifesto for defending Turkey's dignity, the IT worker's sweat, and the people's justice (Can Atalay)!

A SPECIAL CALL TO THE IT WORKER: "DO NOT SURRENDER YOUR CODE TO WAR!"

We are the ones who build the networks that connect the world. We are the ones who write the language of the future. We will not hand over to them our minds and our technology, which NATO has declared its "Sixth Operational Domain"!

• Boycott in the Workplaces: During the summit days, we must organize "Science for Peace" panels in all the technoparks, offices, and data centers that directly or indirectly serve NATO projects.
• Digital Barricade: On social media and digital platforms, we must bring our dossiers on NATO's bloody record and the violations of digital sovereignty in Turkey to millions. Every line of code we write must, on that day, be the language of peace.

A CALL TO UNIONS AND DEMOCRATIC MASS ORGANIZATIONS

The interest of the working class lies not beside imperialism's war machine, but directly opposite it!

• United Front: Shoulder to shoulder with TİP, EMEP, and all other progressive forces, we must carry the demand "Out of NATO, Close the Bases" from the workplaces to the streets.
• The July 7-8 Ankara March: As workers coming from all four corners of Turkey, we will gather in front of Ankara Station, hanging banners that read "Justice Is the People, NATO Is Invasion!"

3. OUR CONCRETE DEMANDS: WE HAVE NO LUXURY TO POSTPONE!

We are not merely "against"; we want "another world." We will strike the summit table in Ankara with these four fundamental demands, through the will of the people:

1. An End to NATO Membership: Turkey must immediately leave this crime syndicate, and all bilateral military agreements must be annulled.
2. Close the Bases: From İncirlik to Kürecik, all foreign boots and radars on our soil must be dismantled and cast out.
3. Digital Sovereignty: All NATO "backdoors" in our defense and communication infrastructure must be cleaned out, and our digital infrastructure must be made fully independent.
4. Justice Right Now: Can Atalay—the will of the people—and other political prisoners must be released; the constitution must be applied according to the needs of the people, not of imperialism.

CONCLUSION**: STANDING ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY**

A FUTURE IN THE SOVEREIGNTY OF REASON AND THE LIGHT OF SCIENCE

My friends, my comrades;

The history of humanity is the endless struggle between darkness and light, between dogmatic destruction and rational construction. The landscape we see today, looking toward the 2026 Ankara NATO Summit, is unfortunately that of modern science and human reason being made fuel for a primitive appetite for domination, for a war machine. But with the vision of an intellectual, we know that the foundation of the future will be built not on bullet casings, but on an emancipated reason.

1. The Ethics of Science: In the Service of Life, Not Death

Science is by its nature universal and knows no borders. But structures like NATO reduce science to a "particular" instrument of strategic superiority, to a technology of mass destruction. A true vision of the future is a world in which artificial intelligence is used not to acquire targets but to heal diseases; in which algorithms are written not to manipulate peoples but to distribute resources justly. As long as reason does not free itself from the shadow of gun barrels, it cannot be considered to have proven its maturity.

2. The New Definition of Sovereignty: Intellectual and Technological Competence

Independence is not merely stringing barbed wire along border lines. True independence is a country's ability to produce its own knowledge, to protect its own data, and to make its own decisions without asking any "higher command echelon." The digital mandate that NATO imposes is the colonization of reason. The future we envision will rise upon an infrastructure that has no "backdoors"—transparent, auditable, and entrusted to the collective intelligence of the people.

3. Justice: The Social Contract of Reason

For an intellectual, justice is not merely a legal term but the reflection of reason in social life. The arbitrary imprisonment of the elected will (as in the case of Can Atalay) is a rejection of reason. The "security" discourse of pacts like NATO is, more often than not, a curtain concealing the slaughter of law and justice. In the world of the future, security will be provided not with more weapons, but with more law, more transparency, and a social peace built under the guidance of reason.

4. A Call to Enlightenment: The Rationality of Peace

War is the bankruptcy of reason. The "culture of conflict" that is NATO's reason for existence is the greatest obstacle before a rational future. The real "strategic depth" we must defend as intellectuals is a world in which peoples are connected to one another not by bullets, but by knowledge, by culture, and by the ideal of a shared future.

In short: Those who will convene in Ankara in July 2026 may represent the dark reflexes of the past. But the future belongs to those who hold the guidance of science, the filter of reason, and human dignity above every kind of military pact. Our task is to free science from the shackle of militarism and to liberate reason from colonial dogmas.

The right side of history stands not in the gleam of gun barrels, but beside those who stand in the light of libraries, laboratories, and free consciences.

The future will be built with reason, with science, and with a fully independent will.

DISBAND THE WAR ORGANIZATION NATO!

A FULLY INDEPENDENT AND DEMOCRATIC TURKEY!